Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update decomposition plot to take numerical or analytical weights #30

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

jdebacker
Copy link
Member

This PR updates the iot_user.JJZFig4 method to plot the weight decomposition for either the numerical or analytically derived weights.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.79%. Comparing base (10985c1) to head (1905253).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (10985c1) and HEAD (1905253). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (10985c1) HEAD (1905253)
unittests 3 2
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #30       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   72.81%   55.79%   -17.02%     
===========================================
  Files           3        3               
  Lines         103      138       +35     
===========================================
+ Hits           75       77        +2     
- Misses         28       61       +33     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 55.79% <ø> (-17.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jdebacker jdebacker merged commit 8599cfb into PSLmodels:main Dec 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@jdebacker jdebacker deleted the jjzfig4 branch December 19, 2024 19:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants